a crazy theory? : TrueCrime

a loopy principle? : TrueCrime

Elizabeth Barraza was gunned down in her driveway on January 25, 2019 at 6:52 am in Tomball, Texas. She was organising for a storage sale to make a bit more money earlier than an anniversary journey along with her husband that was alleged to happen on January 27. By all accounts, the couple have been the perfect of pals and have been cherished by all…no obvious enemies or grudges held towards them by anybody in or out of their private circles.

Caught on video, the assailant is seen driving a truck previous Elizabeth’s home, approaching her, pulling out a gun, and taking pictures her 4 occasions earlier than sprinting away. With no obvious motive or suspect in thoughts, many consider this was an expert hit on Elizabeth’s life. The one query: who would need Elizabeth (a girl with no enemies) lifeless?

(Hyperlink under for missed particulars)

I do know this sounds insane, however what if it’s a case of mistaken id?

Say there’s a contract killer that stakes out the home the night time earlier than Elizabeth’s homicide and once more within the morning. The killer sees Sergio go away for work after which sees Elizabeth outdoors organising the storage sale. She or he then approaches Elizabeth and asks if she’s x (meant goal). Elizabeth would say no she’s not, however because the killer has proven his or her face to Elizabeth, she has to go too to make sure that this killer can’t be recognized.

As for the ring doorbell video, the killer would have pulled up both earlier than or after the home as a result of it will be manner too apparent in the event that they pulled up proper in entrance, and since Elizabeth was outdoors after they arrived, they only drove previous. I’m questioning if the killer would have simply went as much as the entrance door if Elizabeth wasn’t outdoors? It doesn’t appear that suspicious or just like the killer had earlier information of the doorbell digital camera, it appears pure to not be proper in entrance.

Do you suppose it’s doable that Elizabeth was simply collateral for one more hit? Or do you continue to suppose she was at all times an meant goal? Please let me know and debunk me so I don’t go loopy over this!

fast abstract on the case

Supply hyperlink

Leave a Reply